I agree with you on this! No super star - just a bunch of good players though. I wouldn't necessarily want just a bunch of "just okay" players and no super star. Give me a team where no one player has heads and shoulders distinguished themselves and everybody has a chance to "be the man" by proving it on the field. Those teams (again as long as you do have play makers) are fun and grind harder!cavaliereagle wrote:No Cam Smith's at Westwood this year. I actually like a team better without super stars. It stops the opposing team from keying on one player. Of course, there are advantages to both situations.
I've seen a super star team grind hard too though - don't want to act like it can't happen or hasn't happened! It's just human nature to lean on the star too much!