Can you tell me.who the Rebs will host next week please sir?Penguin wrote:What do you need? NA will be the #3 seed and host Laurens next week. That's the poop so farjustanotheridiot wrote:Any idea on D-2 projections especially with NA win?
First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
-
- Byrnes Rebels
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:11 pm
- Location: District 5 The Land Of Football Gods
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
Winning isn't everything,, it's the only thing. - Vince Lombardi
- EHSMeanGreen
- Easley Green Wave
- Posts: 2435
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 1:32 pm
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
I think I did pretty good on this bracket projection!EHSMeanGreen wrote: DIVISION TWO
1 Goose Creek
16 Wade Hampton
8 South Pointe
9 Irmo
4 South Florence
13 Easley
5 Stratford
12 Nation Ford
2 Northwestern
15 West Florence
7 Greenwood
10 York
3 North Augusta
14 Laurens
6 Beaufort
11 Blythewood
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d69/41d6961e2d7bfa9d15e7bf26d49f0b64bb5bfa23" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41d69/41d6961e2d7bfa9d15e7bf26d49f0b64bb5bfa23" alt="Mr. Green :mrgreen:"
It helps to go 25-1 picking 4A games (straight up) this week.
I missed the Mauldin-Boiling Springs game.
Shuffled my D1 bracket a bit.
Rebel-Fan-74 warned about how good Mauldin was, should have listened.
(I thought I was picking the better defense and they give up 83!)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3341e/3341ecb026bc15784eb8842e753bd48da52d7613" alt="Embarrassed :oops:"
-
- Irmo Yellowjackets
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
One question about the SC playoff system. It may or may not concern the points system, which I'm slowly coming to understand. But If they are sixteen teams seeded 1-16. The #1 seed on one side(lower state?) and #2 on the other side(upper state?).......how come the rest of the seeding's in each bracket doesn't follow suit?
example of what I mean:
1 vs 16
5 vs 12
3 vs 14
7 vs 10
and
2 vs 15
6 vs 11
4 vs 13
8 vs 9
example of what I mean:
1 vs 16
5 vs 12
3 vs 14
7 vs 10
and
2 vs 15
6 vs 11
4 vs 13
8 vs 9
-
- Byrnes Rebels
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:47 am
- Location: LA LA LAND
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
justanotheridiot wrote:One question about the SC playoff system. It may or may not concern the points system, which I'm slowly coming to understand. But If they are sixteen teams seeded 1-16. The #1 seed on one side(lower state?) and #2 on the other side(upper state?).......how come the rest of the seeding's in each bracket doesn't follow suit?
example of what I mean:
1 vs 16
5 vs 12
3 vs 14
7 vs 10
and
2 vs 15
6 vs 11
4 vs 13
8 vs 9
There is no UPPER STATE and LOWER STATE in AAAA.
http://www.schsl.org/2013brackets/fb4-1.pdf
-
- Irmo Yellowjackets
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
Wasn't sure but still why the odd seeds per bracket?
-
- Byrnes Rebels
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:47 am
- Location: LA LA LAND
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
I am not sure I follow you...justanotheridiot wrote:Wasn't sure but still why the odd seeds per bracket?
If you have 16 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 17
If you have 8 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 9
If you have 4 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 5
If you have 2 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 3
The lowest seeded team plays the highest seed when the bracket is set up and if there are no upsets, they would always be that way...
But there will be upsets!
-
OnlineSF Band dad
- South Florence Bruins
- Posts: 3815
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:14 pm
- Location: Florence
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
Now I'm confused.Rebel-Fan-74 wrote:I am not sure I follow you...justanotheridiot wrote:Wasn't sure but still why the odd seeds per bracket?
If you have 16 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 17
If you have 8 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 9
If you have 4 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 5
If you have 2 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 3
The lowest seeded team plays the highest seed when the bracket is set up and if there are no upsets, they would always be that way...
But there will be upsets!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b775/4b775ee6210d1662e4e7006d0b4b09d0d14dbac0" alt="Wink ;)"
-
- Byrnes Rebels
- Posts: 3436
- Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:47 am
- Location: LA LA LAND
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
Week 1...week 2..week 3SF Band dad wrote:Now I'm confused.Rebel-Fan-74 wrote:I am not sure I follow you...justanotheridiot wrote:Wasn't sure but still why the odd seeds per bracket?
If you have 16 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 17
If you have 8 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 9
If you have 4 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 5
If you have 2 teams you add the two seeds together it adds to 3
The lowest seeded team plays the highest seed when the bracket is set up and if there are no upsets, they would always be that way...
But there will be upsets!I think your final comment sums it up, the #1 seed is given the (theoretical) easiest path to the championship game. #1 goes in the top half, #2 and #3 in the lower half, #4 in the top,......continue.
1+16=17
..............1+8=9
9+8=17
.......................1+4=5
4+13=17
.............4+5=9
5+12=17
-
- Irmo Yellowjackets
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2013 11:49 pm
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af0da/af0dae515b9a3efa8fcf38efff75c658a391575a" alt="Shocked :shock:"
Anyway, ya'll guys did a helluva job on the projections. Thanks for all your help.
Let the fun begin and Good luck to all.
- EHSMeanGreen
- Easley Green Wave
- Posts: 2435
- Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2013 1:32 pm
Re: First Look at Playoff Projections for 11/2
#1 has earned the right for the potential of playing #4 instead of #3.justanotheridiot wrote:Ok to early on Saturday for all that.... ya'll gentleman know a lot more than me. I just would think you would want a #1 vs #3 and #2 vs #4 semis if possible but I know the upsets will happen like you said and it will all come out in the wash.
Anyway, ya'll guys did a helluva job on the projections. Thanks for all your help.
Let the fun begin and Good luck to all.
NCAA basketball and most tourneys that I can think of are set up this way.
Only exception that I can recall is a few of the lesser Tennis tournaments have #1 vs #3 and #2 vs #4 semis.
But I don't think the Major tournaments are that way.