SCPrepTalk

Posted: **Sun Sep 24, 2023 6:56 pm**

Wow, it's like a ref who doesn't know who was wearing the dark colored jerseys....

Usually Injuns get those type of calls in their favor; but not this time! No way that was a catch.

Posted: **Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:13 am**

Play in question is at the 3:10:22 mark of the video.

Posted: **Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:48 am**

That was def not a catch.

Posted: **Mon Sep 25, 2023 9:59 am**

Nope.

Posted: **Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:06 am**

No catch....

Posted: **Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:36 am**

If it were on national TV, Gene Steratore and other rules experts would defend the official and say it looks like he made a football move.

Posted: **Mon Sep 25, 2023 12:15 pm**

Nope not a catch

Posted: **Tue Sep 26, 2023 10:16 am**

AngryMax wrote: ↑
Mon Sep 25, 2023 11:36 am
If it were on national TV, Gene Steratore and other rules experts would defend the official and say it looks like he made a football move.

Posted: **Wed Sep 27, 2023 6:03 am**

You know what really gets me with this.in tbe second quater gaffney fumbles clearly fort gets the ball back.
Clear as day .they give it to gaffney and they score .
I call this a wash .I haven't seen one post well we gotta give me with that fumble so.
So take 9ne score away from each.
I've heard arguments well this could have cost us the game well that give me fumble may have shifted momentum also.

SCPrepTalk

Catch or no catch?

Catch or no catch?

Re: Catch or no catch?

Re: Catch or no catch?

Re: Catch or no catch?

Re: Catch or no catch?

Re: Catch or no catch?

Re: Catch or no catch?

Re: Catch or no catch?

Re: Catch or no catch?

Re: Catch or no catch?