Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Discussions for fans of all teams and all classes of South Carolina High School Football.
Online
User avatar
SF Band dad
South Florence Bruins
Posts: 3818
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:14 pm
Location: Florence

Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by SF Band dad »

I used MaxPreps' Freeman ranking system to compare the relatively strength and competitiveness of each region.
Below are the average team ranking, standard deviation and range (strongest to weakest) for each region.

Region # - Avg - - StDev Range
Region 1 – 12.7 – 14.1 – 38.3
Region 2 – 34.6 – 20.8 – 65.2
Region 3 – 30.3 – 16.0 – 42.8
Region 4 – 29.9 – 11.2 – 27.1
Region 5 – 34.8 – 15.0 – 38.5
Region 6 – 13.0 – 14.8 – 44.6
Region 7 – 19.8 – 14.0 – 34.9
Region 8 – 17.9 – 21.2 – 56

Strongest: Region 5 (34.8), Region 2 (34.6) is a close runner up but was pulled down by Riverside.
Weakest: Region 1 (12.7), Region 6 (13.0) is a close runner up that was pulled up by (over-rated) Carolina Forest.
Most competitive: Region 4 with the lowest standard deviation and range.
Least competitive: Tie – Region 8 with the highest standard deviation, region 2 with the largest range.

Online
User avatar
SF Band dad
South Florence Bruins
Posts: 3818
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:14 pm
Location: Florence

Re: Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by SF Band dad »

Interesting, it seems we have some upper / lower state parity.
- Strong: 2 and 5
- Weak: 1 and 6
- Competitive: 4 and 7
- Not competitive: 2 and 8

Damefan
No Team Affiliation
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:24 am

Re: Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by Damefan »

Great information! Region 1 doesn't surprise me, nor did Region 8. Look at their performance when they get to the playoffs. As a rule they have a tough time because of the lack of competition during the regular season or they luck up based on having a rested and talented team that hasn't gotten beaten up all season like a Byrnes, Dorman, or Gaffney. With that said, those teams are ready for any competition when it comes playoff time because they have already played several mini-playoff games. Teams like Fort Dorchester, Goose Creek, and others in weaker Regions would really help themselves by beefing up their non-conference schedule and worry more about winning the Region Crown and prepping for State than going 11-1 or 12-1 and losing in the first or second round of the playoffs.

Fortd00
Fort Dorchester Patriots
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 3:41 pm

Re: Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by Fortd00 »

Never been a fan of cross bracketing regions 7 and 8. We gain nothing playing cane bay and Wando. Rather keep goose Creek and Berkeley and schedule other teams. Anyway fort did had a different schedule when they scheduled Glynn Academy out of Georgia who unfortunately is not having a good season. I think we would been better had we were able to play Viera out of Florida

bbrown1240
Sumter Gamecocks
Posts: 399
Joined: Sat Nov 09, 2013 9:19 am

Re: Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by bbrown1240 »

Fortd00 wrote:Never been a fan of cross bracketing regions 7 and 8. We gain nothing playing cane bay and Wando. Rather keep goose Creek and Berkeley and schedule other teams. Anyway fort did had a different schedule when they scheduled Glynn Academy out of Georgia who unfortunately is not having a good season. I think we would been better had we were able to play Viera out of Florida
Over the past 10 or so years Sumter has had home and home series with Stratford (for a long time), Goose Creek, and Wando. I think we’ve scrimmaged Fort Dorchester every year for as long as I can remember. I think it’s time to take a break from the scrimmages and schedule a home and home series. Let’s see if this reaches the powers that be. :D

Rebel-Fan-74
Byrnes Rebels
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:47 am
Location: LA LA LAND

Re: Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by Rebel-Fan-74 »

One thing to remember when comparing Regions like this...

8 Team Regions - 5 Team Regions

To do a real comparison, only use 5 teams from the 8 team Regions.

Take Riverside, Hillcrest, and Spartanburg out of Region Two and the competitiveness numbers will look a lot different.
.

- * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -* -
I'm thinking about entering the transfer portal!
- * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -* -

Fortd00
Fort Dorchester Patriots
Posts: 86
Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2019 3:41 pm

Re: Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by Fortd00 »

bbrown1240 wrote:
Fortd00 wrote:Never been a fan of cross bracketing regions 7 and 8. We gain nothing playing cane bay and Wando. Rather keep goose Creek and Berkeley and schedule other teams. Anyway fort did had a different schedule when they scheduled Glynn Academy out of Georgia who unfortunately is not having a good season. I think we would been better had we were able to play Viera out of Florida
Over the past 10 or so years Sumter has had home and home series with Stratford (for a long time), Goose Creek, and Wando. I think we’ve scrimmaged Fort Dorchester every year for as long as I can remember. I think it’s time to take a break from the scrimmages and schedule a home and home series. Let’s see if this reaches the powers that be. :D
I agree. I don't see why Sumter and Fort don't play. They won't see each other in the playoffs at all unless Sumter fall to second place in the region or however it works sending them to the lower state. The scrimmages cool but get a real game. I mean we did play Dorman one year, we should do a home and home with someone. I say drop Wando and cane bay and make it happen. Interesting to see who we schedule next season. Viera wanna play again and I think Glynn wanna make a series, dunno for sure

Damefan
No Team Affiliation
Posts: 513
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2015 11:24 am

Re: Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by Damefan »

Instead of Fort D playing Glynn who is ranked #97 in the State of Georgia why not play Lowndes #1 or Valdosta #7 currently. Even Camden Co is only a little further than Glynn and is ranked #14. Then you would get a true barometer like De La Salle did when they played St Thomas Aquinas out of Ft. Lauderdale. If you are ranked at the top 10, play someone else at least in the top 10.

Online
User avatar
SF Band dad
South Florence Bruins
Posts: 3818
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:14 pm
Location: Florence

Re: Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by SF Band dad »

Rebel-Fan-74 wrote:One thing to remember when comparing Regions like this...

8 Team Regions - 5 Team Regions

To do a real comparison, only use 5 teams from the 8 team Regions.

Take Riverside, Hillcrest, and Spartanburg out of Region Two and the competitiveness numbers will look a lot different.
Yes, if you throw out data points on either end of the range the numbers look different. Might as well throw out Dorman, Byrnes and Gaffney, region 2 would look a lot more competitive then. :ugeek:

Chuckster
Goose Creek Gators
Posts: 161
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2018 8:37 am

Re: Comparison of region strength and competitiveness

Post by Chuckster »

SF Band dad wrote:Interesting, it seems we have some upper / lower state parity.
- Strong: 2 and 5
- Weak: 1 and 6
- Competitive: 4 and 7
- Not competitive: 2 and 8
Great info....I did not see Region 3 5A in the above numbers. Where would this Region fall in the respective listings?

Post Reply