WE GOING TO HAVE A 5 GAME CONFERENCE SCHEDULE STARTING IN MID-SEPT, NO LONG AWAY GAMES, SO WE LOST SUMTER, RIVER BLUFF, SUMMERVILLE, FORT, ASHLEY RIDGE
GAMES. SAD DAYS
just got off the phone with a good source
- CITYSLICKER
- Berkeley Stags-680 games and counting
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:19 pm
just got off the phone with a good source
680 - STAGS GAMES AND COUNTING
- CITYSLICKER
- Berkeley Stags-680 games and counting
- Posts: 7668
- Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 9:19 pm
Re: just got off the phone with a good source
GAMES TO PLAY
STALL
GOOSE CREEK
AT WANDOE
SADFORD
AT CANE BAY
STALL
GOOSE CREEK
AT WANDOE
SADFORD
AT CANE BAY
680 - STAGS GAMES AND COUNTING
-
- Greenwood Eagles
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2019 10:17 am
Re: just got off the phone with a good source
The SCHSL IS WORTHLESS.
Re: just got off the phone with a good source
Still got time to adjust that.CITYSLICKER wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 11:16 amWE GOING TO HAVE A 5 GAME CONFERENCE SCHEDULE STARTING IN MID-SEPT, NO LONG AWAY GAMES, SO WE LOST SUMTER, RIVER BLUFF, SUMMERVILLE, FORT, ASHLEY RIDGE
GAMES. SAD DAYS
I do not see yLl giving up two money games.
-
- HS Football Fanatic
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:31 am
Re: just got off the phone with a good source
Money games don't really matter if no or very little fans are allowed in games. I think thats the issue, without fans, some coaches would rather not play non-region games. I have actually heard a different scenario. Region schedule only, but spaced out every couple of weeks, to protect against a situation where a player(s) is COVID positive and they have to stop practice for a few days to fully disinfect facilities. Also, with school districts all over the state operating on different schedules, this gives each team a "fair shake" to get at least 5 practices in between games.Fortfor5 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:14 pmStill got time to adjust that.CITYSLICKER wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 11:16 amWE GOING TO HAVE A 5 GAME CONFERENCE SCHEDULE STARTING IN MID-SEPT, NO LONG AWAY GAMES, SO WE LOST SUMTER, RIVER BLUFF, SUMMERVILLE, FORT, ASHLEY RIDGE
GAMES. SAD DAYS
I do not see yLl giving up two money games.
Re: just got off the phone with a good source
a question that i have been trying to get an answer to.............if we only have online school, no classroom instruction, do you think we will still have football ???............
Re: just got off the phone with a good source
Even with reduced fans a check is a check though.FootballFan4343 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:28 pmMoney games don't really matter if no or very little fans are allowed in games. I think thats the issue, without fans, some coaches would rather not play non-region games. I have actually heard a different scenario. Region schedule only, but spaced out every couple of weeks, to protect against a situation where a player(s) is COVID positive and they have to stop practice for a few days to fully disinfect facilities. Also, with school districts all over the state operating on different schedules, this gives each team a "fair shake" to get at least 5 practices in between games.Fortfor5 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 2:14 pmStill got time to adjust that.CITYSLICKER wrote: ↑Thu Jun 25, 2020 11:16 amWE GOING TO HAVE A 5 GAME CONFERENCE SCHEDULE STARTING IN MID-SEPT, NO LONG AWAY GAMES, SO WE LOST SUMTER, RIVER BLUFF, SUMMERVILLE, FORT, ASHLEY RIDGE
GAMES. SAD DAYS
I do not see yLl giving up two money games.
We have a small region 4 games we almost have ti have a extra game or two.
-
- HS Football Fanatic
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:31 am
Re: just got off the phone with a good source
There is not an answer to this because who knows what local districts will do. One thing is clear, the SCHSL and the Governor are going to leave everything up to local municipalities.
But, the best way to analyze your question is the "legal ramifications". Thats what a lot of this is, everyone is deflecting to someone else to avoid a potential lawsuit if someone were to have complications from COVID-19. The beauty of sports is they are "opt-in", so you lose a lot of your legal power when you opt-in to something. School, normally, is not "opt-in", however by allowing virtual school, that helps to justify that attending school in person is now "opt-in".
So, to answer your question, as best as possible, football is actually less dangerous (from a legal perspective) than attending in-person school. It would be very difficult, barring a clear violation of the COVID-19 guidelines set by the SCHSL, for someone to win a lawsuit over someone getting sick playing sports. Basically they would have to use an argument similar to those that get an injury, where they claim the coaches didn't teach the athlete properly.
-
- No Team Affiliation
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 10:43 am
Re: just got off the phone with a good source
Clear shields for all players should help
-
- HS Football Fanatic
- Posts: 406
- Joined: Wed Oct 22, 2014 7:31 am
Re: just got off the phone with a good source
That would be a great idea, but currently SCHSL prohibits them. Look, at the end of the day, we can keep the athletes and coaches safer than they have ever been. Wear face shields for players, coaches were masks at all times. All players wear gloves, etc, etc. It just comes down to, how bad do they want to do it. The virus isnt going anywhere. Even if we "lockdown" again, it just pops back up as soon as we open back up. So any further lockdowns are pointless. We either find a way to move forward, of we go hide. Thats the options for all of us, in everything we do. Sure, we can wear masks/social distance/etc, but all that does is delay/delay. True elimination is only achieved through a working vaccine that everyone takes, or herd immunity. Thats it.
One interesting thing to note, with the amount of younger people testing positive, it is driving the death rate lower and lower. If cases continue to grow but deaths dont grow by the same amounts, at what point do we say, well, this wasn't as bad as we thought? Right now, its at 2.3% death rate of confirmed cases. Just one week ago, that number was 3.5%. If we use DHEC's projected numbers of cases, then the rate drops to .7%. At what point does that happen? Not trying to start an argument, but what does it need to get to so we say, well this wasn't as deadly as we first thought. Is that what it takes to move forward?