The schl appreciation thread.

[Fortfor5]

get it together man.
You incompetent fools .
BahhhhhhjjhhhhhhwhshshahahHahabab

[CITYSLICKER]

the chair of the committee is the 1996 winning state championship qb

[CITYSLICKER]

just the facts, waiting on just the facts

[Fortfor5]

the chair of the committee is the 1996 winning state championship qb

wth has that got to do with them not screwing around.
Cases seem to be dropping hope it continues .
I could care kess what Lexington wants.most everyone else is ready ti play.
They are welcomed ti forfiet if they chose.

[CITYSLICKER]

we need to play football in january, so shut up, hahaha

[bringthewood]

I don't see why there is reason to complain about the SCHSL. It was formed by member institutions and the constitution was constructed by those member institutions. The lead member of the SCHSL has stated on numerous times that he will enforce what ever the member institutions want to enforce. I.E. He will enforce the rules voted by the members.

HOWEVER

Time and time again, said members have violated the rules that THOSE said members voted on. Those schools took to the courts.

Some suits have lost, and some have won. Each time member schools have cried against the rules that those same member schools have agreed to follow.

So my questions are these:
-If you vote to have a rule (no matter what that rule might be) why would you sue if that rule is imposed on you?
------I guess I don't have another question....

So in conclusion:
If members create an institution and then use procedure to restrict that institution; why would said institution try to limit/direct it's members?

[bringthewood]

I'm in no way a fan of how the League rules, but they are just a conduit of the members schools.

If the member schools don't want to follow the rule THEY put in place, then the League is hog tied.

[CITYSLICKER]

you sure sound like you are one

[bringthewood]

you sure sound like you are one

as grave as I'm to ask.....

'ONE what'...

[CITYSLICKER]

YOU FAVOR THE SCHSL RESPONSES