State budget change could help SCHSL address charter school athletics concerns

Discussions for fans of all teams and all classes of South Carolina High School Football.
Post Reply
User avatar
SCPrepTalk
Site Admin
Posts: 5964
Joined: Tue Aug 15, 2017 12:45 pm

State budget change could help SCHSL address charter school athletics concerns

Post by SCPrepTalk »

State budget change could help SCHSL address charter school athletics concerns
The State
Lou Bezjak, Dwayne Mclemore
May 9, 2023
:arrow: LINK

User avatar
Penguin
Beaufort Eagles
Posts: 2226
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 11:59 pm

Re: State budget change could help SCHSL address charter school athletics concerns

Post by Penguin »

I am in favor of placing all of the "recruiting" Schools into their own Classification so that they have no interaction with traditional High Schools with Attendance Zones. I am also in favor of moving back to the past rules regarding mandatory attendance to the School of one's residence. I am also in favor of a new rule with regards to transfers. A rule that would require a 100% approval from ALL ADs in the Classification of the intended transfer to. This would put a screeching halt to the current "my son is for sale to the highest bidder" malarkey that has put High School Athletics into such a negative spotlight and completely negated the sense of accomplishment for winning State Championships. The numbers from that article speak for themselves. 13 out of 16 State Championships in Classes 1A and 2A in the Fall Calendar year won by "statewide recruitment" schools. The pretense that these Schools are anything other than athletic showcases for the top caliber High School athletes in the state, is completely destroyed by those numbers.
The "Godfather" didn't whine like The "Slobfather" is doing, when he got INDICTED!!!!!

DFOLDMAN
Dutch Fork Silver Foxes
Posts: 1772
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 4:44 pm

Re: State budget change could help SCHSL address charter school athletics concerns

Post by DFOLDMAN »

Penguin wrote:
Mon May 22, 2023 4:52 pm
I am in favor of placing all of the "recruiting" Schools into their own Classification so that they have no interaction with traditional High Schools with Attendance Zones. I am also in favor of moving back to the past rules regarding mandatory attendance to the School of one's residence. I am also in favor of a new rule with regards to transfers. A rule that would require a 100% approval from ALL ADs in the Classification of the intended transfer to. This would put a screeching halt to the current "my son is for sale to the highest bidder" malarkey that has put High School Athletics into such a negative spotlight and completely negated the sense of accomplishment for winning State Championships. The numbers from that article speak for themselves. 13 out of 16 State Championships in Classes 1A and 2A in the Fall Calendar year won by "statewide recruitment" schools. The pretense that these Schools are anything other than athletic showcases for the top caliber High School athletes in the state, is completely destroyed by those numbers.
I like that idea...if there were enough of them to warrant it. I would favor them playing up a classification because of those advantages. I think teams like Gray and Oceanside would find a run through Beaufort, Dillon, Clinton, Daniel, Powdersville and Camden a little stiffer than just waiting on Abbeville....in all sports. I'm not sure the transfer rule is worth the effort. I would hope ADs have more important things to consider to be honest. But making the "collegiate schools" play up one classification from their actual school population would level the field a little better.

Fear The Fox...

Rebel-Fan-74
Byrnes Rebels
Posts: 3436
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 7:47 am
Location: LA LA LAND

Re: State budget change could help SCHSL address charter school athletics concerns

Post by Rebel-Fan-74 »

I like the "put them all together" much more than moving them up. Moving them up just moves the problem from one place to another. Is it fair to the AAA schools? If you are building your own IMG Academy, you are not a public school...
.

- * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -* -
I'm thinking about entering the transfer portal!
- * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * - * -* -

Blister
No Team Affiliation
Posts: 298
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2021 11:59 am

Re: State budget change could help SCHSL address charter school athletics concerns

Post by Blister »

In total agreement with limiting the recruiting and private schools into their own classification. But the recruiting issue goes far beyond just those teams. There are many coaches out there that are openly recruiting to the public schools. Folks know who a lot of them are. And the ones that have that precious “magnet” label on them basically have a license to steal. And many of them do. Unfortunately, across the board, the ability to keep a kid from transferring from his zoned school, and competing coaches not tampering with that, has left the station

DFOLDMAN
Dutch Fork Silver Foxes
Posts: 1772
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2020 4:44 pm

Re: State budget change could help SCHSL address charter school athletics concerns

Post by DFOLDMAN »

Blister wrote:
Wed May 24, 2023 8:48 pm
In total agreement with limiting the recruiting and private schools into their own classification. But the recruiting issue goes far beyond just those teams. There are many coaches out there that are openly recruiting to the public schools. Folks know who a lot of them are. And the ones that have that precious “magnet” label on them basically have a license to steal. And many of them do. Unfortunately, across the board, the ability to keep a kid from transferring from his zoned school, and competing coaches not tampering with that, has left the station
It's not recruiting....it's magic. The player DF needs just...materializes. Magic...you gotta believe.

Fear The Fox...

Post Reply