SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Discussions for fans of all teams and all classes of South Carolina High School Football.
mikey
Gaffney Indians
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:20 pm

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by mikey »

mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 9:57 am
Thank you ,but a little more information than this tiny brain can decipher…there was a list by school here one time that had it posted from Dorman/Wando largest to the smallest with the cut off at each classification…
I found what I was looking for 84 using the search bar and you are the one that posted it..

User avatar
SF Band dad
South Florence Bruins
Posts: 3814
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:14 pm
Location: Florence

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by SF Band dad »

mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 10:01 am
mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 9:57 am
Thank you ,but a little more information than this tiny brain can decipher…there was a list by school here one time that had it posted from Dorman/Wando largest to the smallest with the cut off at each classification…
I found what I was looking for 84 using the search bar and you are the one that posted it..
The raw Dept. of Education numbers don't tell the whole story, students at many charter and magnet schools have to be allocated back to the school they can play sports for.

Example - Lexington 05
Dutch Fork - 1705
Chapin - 1630
Irmo - 1268
Spring Hill - 1102

The students at Spring Hill are allocated back to the HS they are zoned for to come up with the final HSL number. In the last relaignment cycle the HSL never published the list with the final numbers, just the proposed classifications and regions.

8timechamps
Daniel Lions
Posts: 237
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2023 1:05 pm

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by 8timechamps »

To me the issue with the multiplier is that it hurts school choice traditional public school districts as well. Daniel is in Pickens County which is school choice, I would imagine there are a couple hundred students at DWD who are school choice to Daniel because it's much more prestigious academically (by far) than the rest of the schools in the district. It has nothing to do with athletics. So now DWD gets hurt on classification because they're strong academically and offer a bunch of AP courses? And not to mention when they accepted these school-choice kids, they didn't know that they would eventually be counted as 3x a student for athletic purposes. You'd think different decisions would've been made.

Greenville County would be in the same boat likely.
8 Time Champs Now! Go Lions!

Tiger84
Conway Tigers
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:21 pm

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by Tiger84 »

SF Band dad wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 10:36 am
mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 10:01 am
mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 9:57 am
Thank you ,but a little more information than this tiny brain can decipher…there was a list by school here one time that had it posted from Dorman/Wando largest to the smallest with the cut off at each classification…
I found what I was looking for 84 using the search bar and you are the one that posted it..
The raw Dept. of Education numbers don't tell the whole story, students at many charter and magnet schools have to be allocated back to the school they can play sports for.

Example - Lexington 05
Dutch Fork - 1705
Chapin - 1630
Irmo - 1268
Spring Hill - 1102

The students at Spring Hill are allocated back to the HS they are zoned for to come up with the final HSL number. In the last relaignment cycle the HSL never published the list with the final numbers, just the proposed classifications and regions.
I think they didn't post the final numbers so no one would find out how they manipulated their guidelines. They had 7 or 8 teams with 4A numbers playing in 5A, and teams with 5A numbers playing in 4A.

Tiger84
Conway Tigers
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:21 pm

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by Tiger84 »

SF Band dad wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 10:36 am
mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 10:01 am
mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 9:57 am
Thank you ,but a little more information than this tiny brain can decipher…there was a list by school here one time that had it posted from Dorman/Wando largest to the smallest with the cut off at each classification…
I found what I was looking for 84 using the search bar and you are the one that posted it..
The raw Dept. of Education numbers don't tell the whole story, students at many charter and magnet schools have to be allocated back to the school they can play sports for.

Example - Lexington 05
Dutch Fork - 1705
Chapin - 1630
Irmo - 1268
Spring Hill - 1102

The students at Spring Hill are allocated back to the HS they are zoned for to come up with the final HSL number. In the last relaignment cycle the HSL never published the list with the final numbers, just the proposed classifications and regions.
Yes sir you are correct again. (Bet you hear that a lot at home, right? :lol: )
But you get a general idea of how things shape up. The teams on the bubble may vary once the final numbers are put in. What's going to be tricky is the out of zone numbers. Some public schools have those as well as the charters.

Tiger84
Conway Tigers
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:21 pm

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by Tiger84 »

Raw numbers from SC Dept. of Ed. No addons or multiplier used..........


Dorman High 3,925
Summerville High 3,293
Carolina Forest High 3,181
Boiling Springs High 2,796
Ashley Ridge High 2,735
Stratford High 2,710
Clover High 2,698
Wando High 2,593
Cane Bay High 2,490
Lexington High 2,475
James F Byrnes High 2,315
********James F Byrnes Freshman Acad" 810
Spring Valley High 2,314
Fort Dorchester High 2,301
Mauldin High 2,274
Sumter High 2,214
Spartanburg High 2,205
River Bluff High 2,160
Woodmont High 2,157
Blythewood High 2,117
Hillcrest High 2,085
J L Mann High 2,076
West Ashley High 2,043
Ft Mill High 2,041
White Knoll High 2,031
R B Stall High 2,025
Goose Creek High 2,002
Rock Hill High 1,998
T L Hanna High 1,994
Berkeley High 1,943
Easley High 1,885
St. James High 1,880
West Florence High 1,879
Gaffney High 1,878
Nation Ford High 1,871
Indian Land High 1,821
Riverside High 1,816
Greenville Sr High Academy 1,791
Wade Hampton High 1,780
Lugoff Elgin High 1773
Northwestern High 1,764
Lucy Garrett Beckham High 1,763
Greenwood High 1,751
Westside High 1,714
Socastee High 1,712
Conway High 1,711
Dutch Fork High 1,705
North Augusta High 1,697
Ridge View High 1,696
Westwood High 1,689
May River High 1,665
N Myrtle Beach High 1,654
Catawba Ridge High School 1,651
Chapin High 1,630
South Florence High 1,627
James Island Charter High 1,597
Myrtle Beach High 1,595
Laurens Dist 55 High 1,540
Eastside High 1,528
York Comprehensive High 1,525
Midland Valley High 1,486
Greer High 1,413
Colleton County High 1,396
Lancaster High 1,393
Bluffton High 1,384
Airport High 1,338
A. C. Flora High 1,334
Hilton Head Is. High 1,317
Wilson High 1,316
Lower Richland High 1,306
South Aiken High 1,305
Travelers Rest High 1,303
Richland Northeast High 1,301
Berea High 1,296
Pickens High 1,281
Irmo High 1,268
Wren High 1,264
Aiken High 1,254
Brookland-Cayce High 1,222
D W Daniel High 1,216
Beaufort High 1,188
Fountan Inn High 1,187
South Pointe High 1,181
Dreher High 1,155
Belton Honea Path High 1,133
Southside High 1,132
Gilbert High 1,131
Hartsville High 1,125
Camden High 1,123
Walhalla High 1,119
Crestwood High 1,117
Spring Hill High 1,102
Palmetto High 1,086
Blue Ridge High 1,075
Union County High 1,069
Chapman High 1,068
"Orangeburg Wilkinson High
School" 1,050
Hanahan High 1,048
Powdersville High 1,037
Seneca High 1,022
Marlboro County High 1,020
Lakewood High 1,016
Darlington High 990
Carolina Academy (High) 983
Pendleton High 940
Georgetown High 917
Broome High 888
Emerald High 878
Aynor High 878
Gray Collegiate Academy 869
Loris High 864
Battery Creek High 829
Dillon High School 824
Crescent High 821
Philip Simmons High 809
Newberry High 809
Woodruff High 808
West-Oak High 798
Chesnee High 796
Silver Bluff High 789
Manning High 786
N Charleston High 785
Strom Thurmond High 776
Clinton High 760
Chester Sr High 741
East Clarendon Middle-High 728
Timberland High 724
Keenan High 719
Academic Magnet High 718
Pelion High 713
Lake Marion High School 701
Riverview Charter School 698
Green Sea Floyds High 695
Swansea High 694
Saluda High 694
Columbia High 693
Mid Carolina High 692
Kingstree High 686
Hampton County High School 676
Woodland High 669
Liberty High 662
Edisto High School 661
Central High 653
Oceanside Collegiate Academy 653
Fairfield Central High 629
Hardeeville Junior/Senior High 626
Cheraw High 616
Legion Collegiate Academy 602
Eau Claire High 599
North Central High 598
Marion High 597
Andrew Jackson High 594
"Batesburg-Leesville High
School" 570
McBee High 568
Mullins High 568
Landrum High 568
Barnwell High 562
Buford High 554
Lake City High 552
Blacksburg High 530
Lake View High 517
Andrews High 509
Baptist Hill High 508
Chesterfield High 501
"Ridge Spring-Monetta
Middle/High" 468
"Whale Branch Early College
Hig" 450
Ninety Six High 445
Lewisville High 428
Abbeville High 427
St Johns High 423
Calhoun County High 418
Lee Central High 417
Latta High 406
Military Magnet Academy 400
"Carvers Bay Early College and
Career High" 382
Great Falls High 377
C A Johnson High 369
Bethune-Bowman Middle/High 367
Burke High 359
Johnsonville High 358
Bamberg-Ehrhardt High 354
Hannah Pamplico High 342
Branchville High School 330
Allendale Fairfax High 294
Cross High 294
Atlantic Collegiate Academy 281
North Middle/High 260
Ware Shoals High 246
Wagener-Salley High 239
Swansea High Freshman Acad 237
"Hunter-Kinard-Tyler High
School" 230
McCormick High 204
Williston-Elko High 198
Scott's Branch High 188
Hemingway High 185
Denmark Olar High 183
Blackville-Hilda High 154
Last edited by Tiger84 on Fri Nov 17, 2023 7:26 pm, edited 4 times in total.

Indian14
No Team Affiliation
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2019 3:56 pm

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by Indian14 »

Greenville, Riverside and WH will move up under multiplier. Could Gaffney be 4A???

mikey
Gaffney Indians
Posts: 1144
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:20 pm

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by mikey »

Indian14 wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 5:00 pm
Greenville, Riverside and WH will move up under multiplier. Could Gaffney be 4A???
I believe it’s gonna be close with the growth in the Indian Land and Nation Ford area..

Tiger Guru
No Team Affiliation
Posts: 23
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2021 12:09 am

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by Tiger Guru »

Tiger84 wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 11:15 am
SF Band dad wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 10:36 am
mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 10:01 am
mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 9:57 am
Thank you ,but a little more information than this tiny brain can decipher…there was a list by school here one time that had it posted from Dorman/Wando largest to the smallest with the cut off at each classification…
I found what I was looking for 84 using the search bar and you are the one that posted it..
The raw Dept. of Education numbers don't tell the whole story, students at many charter and magnet schools have to be allocated back to the school they can play sports for.

Example - Lexington 05
Dutch Fork - 1705
Chapin - 1630
Irmo - 1268
Spring Hill - 1102

The students at Spring Hill are allocated back to the HS they are zoned for to come up with the final HSL number. In the last relaignment cycle the HSL never published the list with the final numbers, just the proposed classifications and regions.
I think they didn't post the final numbers so no one would find out how they manipulated their guidelines. They had 7 or 8 teams with 4A numbers playing in 5A, and teams with 5A numbers playing in 4A.
The reason some with 4A numbers were playing 5A and vice versa is because it’s always been allowed that if 2 schools agree to switch their enrollment number then it can happen. Dutch fork I believe had 4A numbers last time but are playing 5A (as they should). Could you imagine them playing 4A? But it will be interesting to see these numbers adjusted after they send them back in for the multiplier. Also you have to take 12 grade numbers off those top number they’re included in sc Ed. But SCHSL takes those off.

Tiger84
Conway Tigers
Posts: 89
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2021 1:21 pm

Re: SCHSL Enacts Multiplier / Realignment

Post by Tiger84 »

Tiger Guru wrote:
Sat Nov 18, 2023 9:33 am
Tiger84 wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 11:15 am
SF Band dad wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 10:36 am
mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 10:01 am
mikey wrote:
Fri Nov 17, 2023 9:57 am
Thank you ,but a little more information than this tiny brain can decipher…there was a list by school here one time that had it posted from Dorman/Wando largest to the smallest with the cut off at each classification…
I found what I was looking for 84 using the search bar and you are the one that posted it..
The raw Dept. of Education numbers don't tell the whole story, students at many charter and magnet schools have to be allocated back to the school they can play sports for.

Example - Lexington 05
Dutch Fork - 1705
Chapin - 1630
Irmo - 1268
Spring Hill - 1102

The students at Spring Hill are allocated back to the HS they are zoned for to come up with the final HSL number. In the last relaignment cycle the HSL never published the list with the final numbers, just the proposed classifications and regions.
I think they didn't post the final numbers so no one would find out how they manipulated their guidelines. They had 7 or 8 teams with 4A numbers playing in 5A, and teams with 5A numbers playing in 4A.
The reason some with 4A numbers were playing 5A and vice versa is because it’s always been allowed that if 2 schools agree to switch their enrollment number then it can happen. Dutch fork I believe had 4A numbers last time but are playing 5A (as they should). Could you imagine them playing 4A? But it will be interesting to see these numbers adjusted after they send them back in for the multiplier. Also you have to take 12 grade numbers off those top number they’re included in sc Ed. But SCHSL takes those off.
Dutch Fork has solid 5A numbers when the Spring Hill numbers are factored into the total.

Post Reply